Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 58(2): 152-155, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639177

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of multiple myeloma with daratumumab (DARA) is increasing fast. Unfortunately, this antibody also attaches to red blood cells (RBCs) and mimics an autoantibody's panreactivity during pre-transfusion testing, necessitating specialized techniques, (e.g. dithiothreitol (DTT)) for alloantibody detection. Many hospitals use a reference lab for such testing, increasing both cost and turn-around time (TAT). Herein, we compare the cost and TAT, pre and post-implementation of an in-house DTT protocol. METHODS: We designed a validation of our in-house DTT protocol from Nov to Dec 2017 with full implementation on January 1, 2018. We retrospectively reviewed all pre-transfusion tests on DARA patients from Feb 2016 to April 2018, pre and post-implementation of in-house DTT testing. Descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics and a Student t-test was used to compare cost and TATs (pre and post-implementation). RESULTS: We identified 49 patients on DARA treatment requiring transfusion. Samples from these patients were sent to the reference lab 104 times and were tested in-house 28 times. The average TAT for the reference lab was 19h25 m compared to our in-house TAT of 5h9m (an average time-savings of 14h16 m). We spent approximately $33,800 ($325 per test) for 104 reference lab samples versus $806.12 (˜$28.79 per test) for in-house testing of 28 samples. CONCLUSION: We provide an easily implementable DTT protocol for pre-transfusion testing community hospitals and beyond. As more monoclonal antibodies are developed and approved for clinical use, the lessons learned with DARA will expand to deal with interference from future targeted therapies.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Ditiotreitol/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Hospitais Comunitários/normas , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ditiotreitol/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 99(13): 1025-35, 2007 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17596576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of finasteride in preventing prostate cancer in 18,882 men aged 55 years or older. The PCPT offered an opportunity to prospectively study the effects of finasteride and other covariates on sexual dysfunction. METHODS: We assessed sexual dysfunction in 17,313 PCPT participants during a 7-year period. A battery of questionnaires assessed sexual dysfunction (Sexual Activity Scale score); age; race; SF-36 Mental Health Inventory-5, Physical Function, and Vitality scores; body mass index; smoking status; and the presence of diabetes and hypertension. Assessments began at month 6 after random assignment and included the Sexual Activity Scale score at randomization as a covariate. Two-sided general t tests, with a cutoff of P value less than .05, were used to determine the statistical significance for mixed model effects with correlated random time slopes and intercepts. The changing impact of covariates on sexual dysfunction was also assessed at 6 months, 3.5 years, and 6.5 years after randomization. RESULTS: Finasteride increased sexual dysfunction only slightly and its impact diminished over time; the increase in the Sexual Activity Scale score relative to placebo of 3.21 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.83 to 3.59 points; P<.001) at the first assessment decreased to 2.11 points (95% CI = 1.44 to 2.81 points; P<.001) at the end of study. These Sexual Activity score values were small on a scale of 0-100, the range observed in the study, and in comparison with individual variation. After adjustment for all covariates, mean sexual dysfunction increased in both arms from baseline (6 months after randomization) by 1.26 Sexual Activity points (95% CI = 1.16 to 1.36 points; P<.001) per year, corresponding to a cumulative increase of 8.22 points (95% CI = 7.52 to 8.92 points; P<.001) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of finasteride on sexual functioning is minimal for most men and should not impact the decision to prescribe or take finasteride.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/induzido quimicamente , Finasterida/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anticarcinógenos/farmacologia , Colestenona 5 alfa-Redutase/antagonistas & inibidores , Método Duplo-Cego , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...